The Holistic Alliance for Real Ecology (HARE)

‘Holistic in outlook, pragmatic in action’

ABOUT HARE

HARE was formed in February 2020 at Hardwick House, Whitchurch-on-Thames in Oxfordshire, with the task of creating a united and purposeful front to expose, challenge and reverse our present deeply oppressive, corrupted and degraded political and economic systems.

Our country’s ancient freedoms are now under threat like never before as corporate megalomaniacs pursue a clear global agenda that’s taking us down a road to a technology-based totalitarian and centralised society, completely at odds with the values of human-scale ecology we all hold dear. Freedom has to prevail over fascism.

To achieve this, HARE is committed to developing a fresh socio-economic model that’s based upon holistic, humanitarian and just practices for the betterment of all humanity.

What we seek to do:

Bring together individuals and groupings of people committed to promoting:

  • The widespread adoption of human-scale, pro-ecological agriculture.
  • Localised renewable energy production along with supporting deliberately suppressed ‘free energy’ technologies.
  • A radically reformed monetary policy that’s centred around harnessing a nation’s natural wealth and creativity thereby removing the need for invasive taxation and the creation of destructive debt via borrowing at interest from the private central banking system.
  • The full restoration of Common Law Justice that protects the socio-economic, humanitarian and spiritual values that form the very foundation of universal fairness, vibrant health and real happiness for Life on Earth.
Read more
Klaus Schwab, King Charles III and the Great Reset
Does King Charles Support the Globalists?

Read our Universal Declaration for the Future of Humanity

Read our Pushback Strategy

Read our People’s Strategy to Stop the Great Reset

Latest News
5 May, 2023UncategorizedBy Prof. Gloria Moss PhD FCIPD The Hardwick Alliance’s Professor Gloria Moss reveals more UK Secrets behind the Royal Family Curtain. The secret powers of the recently published Oath The text that Charles will add his signature to on Saturday was published recently and it offers the people of Britain and the Commonwealth some extraordinary powers.  For, although academics at University College London’s Constitution Unit state that the oath is of overwhelmingly ‘symbolic significance,’ (2022, p.10), a report by the House of Commons from May this year states that the oath is the only part of the ceremony that is required by law.  The oath is in fact binding, and a contract with the people of the realms that fall under its jurisdiction. So, as millions are pinned to their television screens for the lavish spectacle, one conservatively costing the British taxpayer £100 million (twice the equivalent sum spent on his mother’s coronation), they might like to serve as witnesses to three aspects of the oath. One is the undertaking that Charles will make to govern according to the ‘laws and customs’ of the relevant realms and territories.  A second is to do the utmost in his power to ‘maintain the laws of God’ and a third.  The third aspect to look out for is whether Charles signs the oath below the text as people around the world do, or whether he does as Queen Elizabeth did and signs his signature above the text. [UPDATE 06/05/2023: King Charles signed below the text of his oath.] A word on each of these and the secret power that they offer the peoples of Britain and the Commonwealth. Laws and customs The monarch’s commitment to observe the ‘laws and customs’ of the realms goes back to King Edward II, who is the earliest English coronation for which we have an official record.  Not only that, but Edward II’s oath largely remained the format for a coronation oath for nearly four hundred years, and these words were included also in the oath sworn by Queen Elizabeth II.  Why are these words significant? Well, according to the most authoritative jurist of the thirteenth century, Henry de Bracton, ‘the English hold many things by custom which they do not hold by law’ and ‘kings need only to have allowed the custom for it to be granted’. In saying this, Henry de Bracton brings the Magna Carta within the orbit of ‘customs’ and in so doing, asserts people’s rights as ‘freemen’ alongside their right to a trial by jury, a right specified in Article 39 of the Magna Carta.  What is more, Magna Carta allows, in Article 61, for the lawful rebellion of 25 barons, a right invoked in 2001 and still in force. The bottom line? People in Britain and in the Commonwealth realms can take Charles at his word and assert their right to a trial by jury and to their rights as freemen of the land.   This means that obligations addressed to the so-called legal fiction (the all capitals name that corporatises people rather than addresses them as living beings) are legally rendered null and void. This means that any attempt by the Ministry of Justice in Britain to nullify the freeman of the land philosophy is itself negated by the King’s oath. The laws of God So, the monarch’s undertaking to observe the laws and customs of the realms confirms the power not only of the Magna Carta but also of Common law and people’s status as free men and women. For hundreds of years, monarchs have sworn these words but perhaps now, at a pivotal point in human history, the people can finally use this aspect of the monarch’s oath to assert their sovereign status as living men and women.  What follows from this is tantamount to the legalisation of civil disobedience, whether in the form of non-payment of Council Tax, income tax, or penalty charges, the first two of which must legally require contractual consent and the last of which requires to be heard via a jury trial. And there is much more besides that they can use.  For, a monarch swearing to observe ‘the laws of God’ is swearing to follow the injunctions set down in the first given books of the Bible and this has three important consequences. Firstly, man-made legislation is strictly prohibited and you can refer to this in these sections of Deuteronomy: 4:2 Ye shall not add to the word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish ought from it, that ye may keep the Commandments of the Lord your God which I COMMAND you. 11:1 Therefore thou shalt love the Lord thy God, and keep His charge, and His Statutes, and His Judgments, and His Commandments, always. 12:32 What thing soever I command you, observe to do it: thou shalt not add thereto, nor diminish from it. The force of these words is that the monarch is in breach of their oath the moment that they add their signature to any new statute.  All the kings and queens who have added their signatures to pieces of legislation have broken their oaths and ceased to be legitimate monarchs.  With that, the line of descent, for example from Elizabeth II to Charles, is an illegitimate one. At the same time, all aspects of government, whether the legislature, the executive, or the judiciary, all of which act under the authority of the monarch. Now to the second point.  Deuteronomy outlaws the practice of usury as you can read here: 23:19 Thou shalt not lend upon usury/interest to thy brother; usury of money, usury of victuals, usury of anything that is lent upon usury. So any monarch who allows the continuing practice of usury in their realms is in breach of their oath.  The people would be within their rights to declare that the monarch has breached their oath were they not to take a stand against usury. The third consequence that flows from a monarch’s commitment to observing ‘the laws of God’ concerns their relationship with foreign powers.  Deuteronomy stipulates that a monarch who hands the reigns of power over to an authority who is a ‘stranger’, in other words, someone who is not from your country, would be in dereliction of their duties to God: 17:15 Thou shalt in any wise set king over thee, whom the Lord thy God shall choose: from among thy brethren shalt thou set a king over thee: thou mayest NOT set a stranger over thee, which not thy brother. This would prohibit King Charles III from working closely with any powers outside of Britain, including the World Economic Forum (WEF), the WHO, and of course the UN.  Were he to do this, then the people would be within their rights to claim that the monarch had broken their oath to the people and was now an illegitimate monarch.  This would not only end his moral claim to the throne but as with the other two points, bring to an end all aspects of government, whether the legislature, the executive, or the judiciary, all of which act under the authority of the monarch. Final point: the signature In June 2022, the signed coronation oath of the Queen was digitised for the first time to mark the Queen’s Platinum Jubilee.  As you can see from the image of the oath, the Queen signs the oath above the text of the document, rather than below it as would be customary in a legal document.  There are compelling reasons for signing below since doing this attests to the person’s willingness to abide by the terms in the body of the text.  Moreover, signing below a piece of text prevents new text from being added subsequently. I have written elsewhere (in the UK Column) about the many anomalies in Queen Elizabeth II’s signed coronation oath but when it comes to Charles III’s Coronation Oath, you may want to observe during the ceremony where Charles places his signature.  If it is above the text, as with the Queen’s signature, then you rightly ask whether Charles has entered into a contract with the people of Britain and the Commonwealth and whether he is their rightful king.  As with the case of the three points above, a failure to create a valid contract with the people nullifies his claim to be king and, with that, undermines the judiciary, the legislature, and the executive. The coronation chair There is of course also the vexed question of the wooden coronation chair.  Since the 13th century, British monarchs have been crowned on a chair containing the Stone of Scone seized in 1296 by England’s King Edward I from Scotland’s Scone Abbey following his victory at the Battle of Dunbar. However, on 25 December 1950, four students, all Scottish nationalists, stole the stone from Westminster Abbey on 25 Dec 1950 and returned it to Scotland in the boot of a car.  One of the four, Ian R. Hamilton, subsequently a Q.C., maintained in three of his books that the stone weighed 4cwt (458lbs.) but that the stone in Westminster Abbey, subsequently moved to Edinburgh Castle in 1996, only weighed 3cwt (336lbs.). In September 2022, Historic Environment Scotland confirmed that the object described as the Stone of Destiny in the Crown Room at Edinburgh Castle would be transferred to London for use in King Charles III’s coronation. With possible discrepancies in the weight and also the colour of the stone (some say that the original stone was black, not the current pale colour) doubts remain that the Stone of Scone was used in the Queen’s coronation—and now about to be used in Charles’—is actually the genuine article. The monarch:  a vital check against tyrannous government Breaches of contract by the monarch might lead to strong anti-monarchist sentiment where in fact it would be more productive to maintain a monarchy, with all that it offers in terms of a check against tyrannous government.  So rather than dispensing with monarchy, a national debate could take place on the selection of a new monarch willing to do his or her utmost to respect the laws and customs of Britain and the Commonwealth as well as the laws of God. About Author:  Professor Gloria Moss PhD is the author of over seventy peer review journal and conference papers.  She is the author of eight books, many published by Routledge and Palgrave Macmillan.  Her latest book, written with Katherine Armitage, is Light Bulb Moments and the Power of Critical Thinking (2023), published by Truth University Press, the publisher also of The Dark Side of Academia:  How Truth is Suppressed. Both can be obtained from infotruthuniversity@protonmail.com or direct from Amazon.  Truth University runs two conferences a year, the next being ‘Questioning Science’ on 16-20 August in the Peak District, with Early Bird rates until 15 May 2023.  Details can be obtained from the above email address.  This article was written in consultation with the HARE Alliance for Real Ecology (HARE). ©2023 – Professor Gloria Moss [...] Read more...
22 March, 2023NewsPlease see this accompanying document for more detailed background information about the Bradbury Pound. Please see this web folder for various academic papers and publications discussing the broader topic of alternative monetary systems, summarised in this document. [...] Read more...
17 March, 2023ReportA challenging disclosure researched and written by Professor Gloria Moss in consultation with and commissioned by the Hardwick Alliance for Real Ecology (HARE) https://hardwickalliance.org and https://www.commonlawconstitution.org   The Coronation and the constitutional importance of the Coronation Oath As the mainstream media focus on Harry and Meghan and whether or not they will attend the Coronation on May 6th, a grave constitutional problem demands our attention concerning His Majesty and the Coronation Oath that he is due to take. This article discusses the overwhelming constitutional importance of this oath and its role in protecting the interests and freedoms of the people of Britain and the Commonwealth. Given His Majesty’s proclaimed support for the highly controversial World Economic Forum (WEF), with its global social, economic and ‘climate change’ agendas that will directly affect all of our freedoms and liberties, it is crucial that there is now immediate clarity and reassurance around his primary allegiances and constitutional responsibilities to the people of Great Britain, Northern Ireland and the Commonwealth. This needs to be offered before the Coronation and needs to be in the form of a formal ‘Declaration’ that gives these assurances of his essential constitutional responsibilities to Britain, Northern Ireland and the Commonwealth and that they are enshrined in the Coronation Oath. In addition, there needs to be a ‘Royal Retraction’ of His Majesty’s support for the Davos–based WEF. An urgent ‘Call to Action’ is now needed and this is included at the end of this article. READ MORE (PDF) [...] Read more...
21 February, 2023News / Open LetterOn 24th February 2023, the Hardwick Alliance for Real Ecology sent the attached letter to the Earl Marshal, His Grace the Duke of Norfolk. The monarch is constitutionally required to swear the Coronation Oath to uphold the laws and customs of the land and to protect the rights and freedoms of the British people. The coronation of King Charles III cannot lawfully take place unless and until he issues a formal Royal Retraction of his support for the ‘Great Reset’ promoted by the unelected, unaccountable World Economic Forum. Download letter as PDF [...] Read more...
13 February, 2023News / Open LetterOn the 5th November 2022, the Hardwick Alliance published an open letter to Prime Minister Rishi Sunak and Chancellor of the Exchequer Jeremy Hunt, signed by Justin Walker and Sir Julian Rose, stating ‘immediate action required by his Majesty’s Government to prevent the globally planned collapse of the British Economy!’ Our overture met with resounding silence. In a further attempt to elicit a response from Number 10, Justin Walker subsequently re-submitted the same letter, now re-dated 18th January 2023, via his local Plaid Cymru MP Liz Saville Roberts. On the 9th February, Justin received the following response from Number 10: Note the absence of any name and the illegible signature, and the abject failure to acknowledge any of the substantive points made in our letter, let alone address them in any meaningful way. Accordingly, Justin sent the following email to Liz Saville Roberts MP: It will be instructive to see whether and how Justin’s MP reacts to Number 10’s response. [...] Read more...
1 January, 2023ReportAs many people must now realise, the word ‘green’ has been hijacked.  It used to mean ‘natural’, ‘diverse’, ‘eco-friendly’ and ‘human scale’. That was while bona fide ecologists still held sway over the way the word was used. ‘Green’ meant taking a responsible position concerning the management of planetary resources; having empathy for nature, fertility, ecological food and community involvement. But then in 1992, ‘The Earth Summit’ (Rio Summit) happened, along with ‘Agenda 21’. And something called ‘sustainable development’ became the catch-all promotional spin to sell the prescribed medicine. The deception. That was the beginning of the end of the ‘real greens’ and the arrival of the corporate, banker-backed ‘fake green’ agenda we live with today. The central component of the scam was, of course, ‘global warming.’ Let’s remind ourselves. At first it was called ‘the greenhouse effect’, then ‘global warming’ and then ‘climate change’. Polar ice cap doomsday theorists, like ex-US Vice-President Al Gore, came and went. But the ice didn’t. In Britain the International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) sought to spearhead the ‘Stop Global Warming’ crusade. IPCC gave lucrative contracts to around 2,000 scientists with instructions to produce a computer modelled climate graph which would show almost unstoppable ‘warming from CO₂’… unless… ‘Unless’ strict measures were taken—over a number of years—to stop countries burning any more than their appointed allowance of fossil fuels. With ‘carbon fines’ imposed on those who did not conform. Welcome to Operation “He who controls the climate agenda controls the world.” ‘Green’ became a word conveying the opposite of its original meaning. From being a pro-human, pro-ecological symbol, it became a symbol of corporate green fascism. This was verified by Klaus Schwab, head of The World Economic Forum, in his 2020 Davos announcement of ‘The Great Reset’, an industrialist/banker-led agenda with origins in The Club of Rome and Bilderberg groups of the 1950s, 60s and 70s. Two leading components of the Great Reset are ‘The Green New Deal’ and ‘The Fourth Industrial Revolution’. The omega point of the great Davos fanfare was/is ‘zero CO₂ by 2040’. Zero Carbon—Zero Covid: Twin Phantoms of Planetary Genocide But please note, CO₂ is depicted in ubiquitous media photographs, as smoking factory chimneys. But that has little or nothing to do with CO₂. It is nitrous oxides, carbon monoxide, water vapour and diverse particulates that form the chief components rising up out of those chimneys. There is nil science on display here. Except the science of the lie. The CO₂ lie. Zero CO₂ quite literally means ‘no air to breathe’, as plant life depends upon carbon dioxide to provide the oxygen we breathe. Mr Schwab is also pleased to tell us that ‘in order to save the world’ mankind is to lose its human identity and become a digitally programmed cyborg by 2030. An extension of a super computer programme. A ‘Transhuman’. His chief advisor, Israeli professor Yuval Noah Harari, says “We will do better than God.” In the meantime, transgenic/genetically modified food is announced as the future of the human diet. To include synthetic foods produced from animal cells in laboratory Petri dishes and vegetables grown in vertical hydroponic greenhouses that use no soil. Just water and chemicals. This by 2030. “Man must not be allowed to do any further harm to the environment” say the fake Greens. Instead, thousands of years of traditional ways of working the land must be phased out in a single decade. So, under ‘Green New Deal’, farmers will become redundant, their work taken over by robots. And farm animals, accused of being ‘methane polluters’, will go with them. Redundant farmers and disenfranchised country dwellers are to be herded into digital 5/6G-powered ‘smart cities’ to survive on a diet of insects and synthetic meat, synthetic dairy and synthetic vegetable products. I report this as fact, since Klaus Schwab wrote it in his book ‘The Great Reset’, as well as appearing in somewhat edited form on the World Economic Forum website. So ‘Green New Deal’ is simply the contrived reaction to the contrived ‘global warming-end-of-the-world’ scare story. A story with not a trace of empirical science to back it up. CO₂, ‘the gas of life’ at just 0.04% of atmospheric content, was chosen to be the scapegoat for a totalitarian planetary takeover, a fear-based brainwashing exercise. An exercise to cow humanity into believing the end of the world is coming unless… Unless we embrace a totalitarian New World Order in which all private property is to be transferred into the hands of ‘the dictatorship’, ensuring that “You will have nothing, and you will be happy.” (Klaus Schwab) Let us remind ourselves once again of the Great Green Deal ‘save the world’ message: “For a zero-carbon future, the world must end its dependency on fossil fuels. All energy must be renewable.” But had anyone done their homework before this ’saviour pronouncement’ was made? Seems not, as the intense mining of minerals and the construction of tens of thousands of steel, concrete and aluminium wind generators combine to consume more energy than they give back. All this manufacturing, including photovoltaic, relies heavily on fossil fuels. The very ‘CO₂-causing’ agent supposedly to be kept under the ground. A green agenda, Herr Schwab? At the top of the cult’s pyramid, they know this. The plan has always been to keep the elite well housed, well heated and well fed on organic foods. Fossil fuels will not be phased out, but will be steadily priced out of the market for ordinary people. Sadly, this is what the fake political and non-governmental ‘Green Movement’ has also adopted as its ‘ecological message’. They have been bought out. They followed the money and not their hearts or their heads. They ended up supporting ‘sustainable development’. The Rio Summit lie that has, up until now, fooled the world. And they recently adopted as their leader, none other than the newly-enthroned monarch of the United Kingdom, King Charles III. But is this political, corporate and royal lie already falling apart? The impositions of trade restrictions on Russia was supposed to give the West the political ‘moral high ground’. A chance to show how well the ‘green energy saviour plan’ would work in meeting the needs of citizens of the European Union, when gas, oil and coal supplies are cut off or drastically curtailed. But instead it appears to have caused a frenzied rush to reopen coal mines and buy as much gas and oil as possible from other parts of the world. So where is the fossil-fuel-free ‘Green New Deal’ now? In many ways Covid has been the sweetener for Green New Deal enforcement at the ground level. It was supposed to get us used to living in fear and permanent acceptance of the autocratic behaviour of megalomaniacs preaching global destruction. But quite a few of us didn’t buy it. Quite a few of us held firm to the bio-diverse, ecological, real green agenda for a living, breathing planet earth. Bravo! But ‘we who didn’t buy it’ must do more than individually shout from the roof tops. We must now come together. We must present an impregnable thin red line against the attempted advances of the criminals running this planet. We must hold the line for truth, wisdom, honour, and a future in which ‘Green’ regains its status as the true ecological sign post to a healed planet and a healed humanity. [...] Read more...
12 November, 2022Interview / News / Open LetterOn Friday 11 November 2022, journalist Sonia Poulton interviewed Justin Walker and Julian Rose about the Hardwick Alliance for Real Ecology, and their recent open letter to the Prime Minister and Chancellor of the Exchequer regarding the Bradbury Pound, and other matters. See https://www.soniapoulton.co.uk/ Watch the video: [...] Read more...
22 October, 2022NewsAn important debate took place on 20 October 2022, organised by GB Unite on the topic of  ‘Do we have censorship in the UK or not?’  Those arguing against the motion that there is no censorship include Godfrey Bloom, Matt le Tisiser and Mark Sharman. Those supporting the proposition as to the lack of censorship in the UK included Mike O’Donovan (co-founder of GB Unit along with the Chair, Nicholas Martin), David Charalambous and Professor Sleepeazy, Vice-Chancellor of one of Britain’s top institutions, Shamebridge University. Professor Sleepeazy produced a reassuring account as to the lack of censorship in even our top institutions today and so we reproduce her submission in full.  This submission comes courtesy of Gloria Moss, Professor of Management and Marketing who acted as her devoted amanuensis. Prof Moss is the author of eight books and over 80 peer review journal articles and is also Director of Studies of that new beacon of light, the Truth University (www.truthuniversity.co.uk). Professor Sleepeazy’s submission in full Good evening Chairman, ladies and gentlemen, let me introduce myself, Professor Sleepeazy, Vice-Chancellor of Shamebridge University.  As you know, universities play a pivotal role in our society as educators and also as employers of academics including Vice-Chancellors, whose special skills are recognised in salaries exceeding £500,000. So, it is critical to keep these institutions alive and, here in Britain, since government funding to universities has more than halved in the last 14 years, we encourage our academics to reach for the stars to ensure that Shamebridge continues to deliver an education that shapes the minds of current and future generations. We are proud that all of our professors bring in at least £200k annually and I’d like to present you with three particularly prized areas of research. The first concerns research to ensure the safety of our citizens. One of our professors, originally from the Netherlands, is investigating how an online game that he has created can trigger mental ‘antibodies’ that will arm players against ‘disinformation’ and this vital research is funded by the Department of Homeland Security in the US and the Behavioural Insights Team in Britain. A second stream of research comes from Government research calls. Several of our academics have been successful in competitive rounds of applications.  One is Professor Coffin who won an Economic and Science Research Council (ESRC) government grant for a project entitled ‘Learning to Like Robots’.  Professor Vapid, for his part, won a substantial grant for research on ‘Low carbon trade opportunities’. And, Professor Globaliser won a project entitled ‘Attracting international students to the UK’. Yes, having a high percentage of overseas students may exclude UK students but overseas fees are twice those from British students and the university must be kept afloat to carry on its important mission. Thirdly, we are excited to have the ongoing support of the Hilda and Will Gates Foundation which is funding a large number of scholars, science professors as well as building projects across the university. Initiatives such as these ensure the viability of Shamebridge, allowing our academics to continue their good work.  We must however be vigilant. One of our world-renowned biochemistry professors, an expert on aluminium, was called out for misinformation in his claims that the aluminium in vaccines could be toxic to human health. He had brought in over £2m in funding during his career with us but we had to react quickly and take down his funding website and very regrettably, he had no option but to resign. When another professor, a professor of ethics, refused to conform to the vaccine mandate in 2021, we regrettably had to let her go. The reputation of Shamebridge is paramount and so when another professor, this time of management and marketing, undertook research on a very human and motivational form of leadership that engages with people on an individual levels, grows their confidence and talents, and provides intellectual stimulation, we had to be careful. For this professor’s research clearly evidenced how this form of leadership boosts productivity, mental well-being and motivation in a way that the authoritarian style present in our senior management team cannot. So, we had to stop her from fulfilling a commission to write an article about her research for the main newspaper for universities globally since if we had failed to do this, her article on best practice leadership, would have exposed us as the worst kind of leaders. There would have had serious consequences for our reputation. We had a bit of bother since the professor of management and marketing stated that stopping her article breached her academic freedoms and that academic freedoms were an essential in guaranteeing the impartiality of a university’s work. We got around this by claiming over a rather extended period of time that the ‘timing’ was not right and the fight was pursued into the courts.  You can read all about it in an absolutely dreadful book entitled The Dark Side of Academia: How Truth is Suppressed, written by the Secret Professor with a Foreword by John Hamer, geo-political writer and Afterword by Dr Tess Lawrie, prolific researcher and founder of the World Council for Health. It was published recently by Truth University Press and is available, I regret to say, in the hall tonight and on Amazon. We are particularly proud of two other things. Firstly, our superb record in peer review. The British Government runs a research assessment exercise every seven years and in last year’s assessment of research, government research monies could go only to reward peer review journal articles published in so-called top, four-star journals. So, most of our academics focus their effort on publication in these journals. Three examples of recently published articles by our star academics in four-star journals are: Knowledge leadership and the mobilisation of management research: becoming the object of knowledge The nature and transformation of corporate headquarters:  a review of recent literature and a research agenda High-flying business schools: working together to address the impact of management education and research on climate change. I am very proud to say that professors from Boxford University co-authored the last of these two journal articles. Yes, there have been voices, often Editors-in-Chief of top medical journals, that have thrashed the value of peer review, and I recall a Nobel prize winner, Sydney Brenner, describing peer review as a ‘completely corrupt system’. I even read an article recently in the thinking man’s newspaper, the Guardian, recounting how the man behind the whole edifice of peer review was Robert Maxwell. With fake news and disinformation rampant, and people questioning mainstream narratives, it is now more important than ever for higher education to double down on dissent and wrong thinking, and to ensure that the correct single world-view prevails. The second source of major pride is of course our membership of the WEF Global University Leaders’ Forum. The WEF, the World Economic Forum, is as we know the Davos-based group led by Klaus Schwab, that advocates for the ‘Great Reset’, the Fourth Industrial Revolution that includes important initiatives such as the Internet of Things, AI and transhumanism that the WEF say will leave people owning nothing but nonetheless happy. The WEF Global University Leaders’ Forum includes some of the world’s leading universities, for example from Britain there is Shamebridge, Boxford and Imperial College London and from the US there are a large number of Ivy League universities including Harvard, Yale and Stanford. The forum provides opportunities to develop and pilot educational models and joint research to ensure that a coherent source of truth is developed. If you want to learn more, you can read an article by a very senior professor from Boxford as well as one from Queensland in which they aptly express the view that the role of teaching and research is to: ‘produce models and policies to assist the “Great Reset”’. So, Shamebridge University is dedicated to keeping education alive and in doing this, we must safeguard the well-being and safety of our staff and students. This is one reason we used ‘Prevent’ legislation to shut down a talk on the scientific importance of free speech, due to be give to the Libertarian Society by a psychology academic, since the talk was deemed ‘high risk’ and could have caused disruption. As Jacinda Ardern wisely said in her speech last month to the UN, we must be ever alert to ‘misinformation’ that could be used as a ‘weapon of war’ to cause ‘chaos’. Only by being alert can top universities continue to offer valued education to present and future generations. References: Buranyi, S. (2017), ‘Is the staggeringly profitable business of scientific publishing bad for science?’, The Guardian, 27 June, https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/jun/27/profitable-business-scientific-publishing-bad-for-science World Economic Forum (no date), ‘Global University Leaders Forum (GULF) Members’, https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GULF_Members_18.pdf The Secret Professor (2022), The Dark Side of Academia: How Truth is Suppressed, UK, Truth University Press [...] Read more...
22 October, 2022NewsToday, we are pleased to announce the official launch of our ‘Truth not Tyranny’ campaign. The campaign will be known as ‘TNT’ for short, as it aims to drop a series of metaphorical ‘high-explosive truth bombs’, delivered via social media and email in the form of ‘TNT Alerts’ on various important topics. The Hardwick Alliance is constituted as a ‘network of networks’, which we are extending progressively through new affiliations with other campaign groups and influencers. The intention is that these TNT Alerts will be actively and swiftly shared by our supporters throughout their own networks, creating a waterfall effect that rapidly cascades outwards beyond our ‘awake and aware echo chamber’, thus reaching a vastly wider audience than at present. To be effective, speedy propagation is essential to ensure that each Alert is widely shared before the algorithms have a chance to kick in, and this is where we are asking supporters to ‘step up to the plate’. Each TNT Alert has a standard structure: A social media post containing: An eye-catching graphic or meme, overlaid with: HARE and TNT logos A mention of the Hardwick Alliance for real ecology A link to the Hardwick Alliance website A pithy message A clickable link to a detailed ‘landing page’ Relevant hashtags reflecting current trends, if possible Each social media post consists of no more than 280 characters (the Twitter limit) A landing page on the Truth Not Tyranny website, featuring: The social media post A detailed commentary on the issue at hand, with section headings for legibility References to high-quality source material and further reading Concrete actions that people can take to address the issue A downloadable PDF version of the TNT Alert A list of published TNT Alerts is available on the TNT website. You can participate in the Truth Not Tyranny campaign by doing the following: Subscribing to / following our YouTube/BitChute, Twitter and Instagram channels Liking and sharing / reposting TNT Alerts to your own channels on whatever social media networks you belong to Taking the specific actions suggested by each TNT alert Taking the other actions as applicable to each TNT alert The first TNT Alert will be dropped during the next few days. We thank you in advance for your participation—the more you are able to do, the more successful the campaign is likely to be! [...] Read more...
5 October, 2022Open LetterAn Open Letter to the Prime Minister, the Rt. Hon. Rishi Sunak MP, and the Chancellor of the Exchequer, the Rt. Hon. Jeremy Hunt MP IMMEDIATE ACTION REQUIRED BY HIS MAJESTY’S GOVERNMENT TO PREVENT THE GLOBALLY PLANNED COLLAPSE OF THE BRITISH ECONOMY! As the so-called ‘cost of living crisis’ spirals out of control and the British people face a bleak future of mounting fear, debt, shortages and austerity, the time has now come to activate the virtually unknown but tried and tested fiscal mechanism that saved Britain’s economy from total collapse in August 1914. This deliberately suppressed historical event must now be made public for all to see and understand. The long reign of the criminal central bankers and the unelected, unaccountable power-base that is the City of London must now be brought to an immediate and lasting end!    5th November 2022 Dear Prime Minister and Chancellor of the Exchequer, What follows in this letter is a polite but clear and evidence-based instruction to you both. It is an instruction that is supported by the overriding supremacy of the Common Law as we are dealing with criminal fraud and deception upon a truly massive scale. You must please act now without failure or hesitation. Refusal to comply amounts to a treasonous act of repression against the British people, for whose collective and economic well-being you are now both responsible. For those of us who have recently been listening to high-level whistle-blowers and talking to well-placed people ‘in the know’, there is but one conclusion that can be safely arrived at. Indeed, some believe that the final piece of the intelligence jigsaw dropped into place when His Holiness Pope Francis instructed the Holy See and its connected entities to move all financial assets to the Vatican Bank by the end of September. The drawbridges in the financial world have been or are being raised… and, it would seem, for a very good reason. The growing consensus is that at some point in the coming months, a contrived collapse of the global economy will be attempted, possibly by deliberately detonating the fraudulent $1.5 quadrillion ‘derivatives timebomb’. If this happens, a tsunami of unsustainable debt and financial chaos will sweep across the world, overwhelming and collapsing the markets, causing high-street banks to limit withdrawals from or entirely freeze customer accounts. Counterparty exposure to failing banks could result in financial contagion causing insolvencies in otherwise sound UK banks, triggering the need to activate bail-in resolution protocols. This will result in a financial paralysis on a scale never before seen. In tandem with the scaremongering pseudo-science of anthropogenic global warming, a very dark and pre-planned future of imposed poverty and technological control over the human race is being instigated by those in supposed positions of trust and benign influence. A global power game of enormous proportions is being played out before our eyes and which will be to our collective detriment if we do not act now—these power-hungry globalists appear to have a dark and Orwellian future planned for all of us. The central players in this very real conspiracy (and there is definitely no ‘theory’ involved here!) are the elitist, unelected and unaccountable private individuals at the World Economic Forum (WEF) and the extremely powerful but virtually unknown Bank for International Settlements (BIS). Between them, they are covertly conspiring to collapse the entire global economy to their ultimate political and fiscal advantage. This is being done to create the right conditions needed to implement their so-called Great Reset. This self-styled Build-Back-Better strategy to create a new Fourth Industrial Revolution is constantly being parroted by WEF ‘young global leaders’, many of whom hold positions of actual power in governments around the world. This drive to destabilise the governance of sovereign nations involves using the ‘climate change’ pseudo-science peddled by a corrupt, bought-and-paid-for academia which is integral to the fake Green New Deal. The world is being deceived by a cocktail of outright lies and carefully planned subterfuge, all reinforced by shutting down any form of real debate by the mainstream media, that is enabling a criminal mind-set to unlawfully seize control. It is planned that very soon, invasive surveillance technologies will be used to ‘govern’ each and every one of us—this, as you both well know, is called a ‘technocracy’. These advanced technologies include powerful artificial intelligence; carefully positioned and connected facial recognition software; central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) that will replace cash with a programmable spyware currency; and a social credit system that rewards compliance but which remotely punishes those who try to resist the imposition of tyranny and fascism. This is the same SMART 5G/6G blueprint currently being rolled out by the Chinese Communist Party, a blueprint which is designed to destroy the rights and freedoms of its citizens. The evidence for this is all there to see. However, this treasonous criminal attempt to impose tyranny in the UK, by unlawfully wrecking the British economy, can be stopped in an instant by both of you immediately resorting to a proven fiscal mechanism that saved Britain from financial collapse in August 1914. At the outbreak of World War One, the uncertainty of a global war caused many people to want to exchange their Bank of England debt-laden ‘promise to pay the bearer on demand the sum of…’ bank notes for gold sovereigns and half-sovereigns. Being then on the gold standard but having committed fraud by issuing many times more bank notes than the Bank of England had actual gold in its vaults to underpin their value, the Governor of the Bank of England, Walter Cunliffe, along with other luminaries of the City of London, hurried to see the Chancellor of the Exchequer, David Lloyd George. A run on the banks and a complete collapse of the economy now appeared imminent. This had to be averted at all costs, especially as the nation was now mobilising to fight this global war. To do this, the Currency and Bank Notes Act 1914 was rushed through Parliament in just two days, which authorised HM Treasury to issue debt-free, interest-free Treasury notes backed by the wealth and creativity of the British nation. This fiscal process is still used today to create the loose coinage in our pockets. Within another three days, these new ‘Bradbury’ Treasury notes had been distributed right across the country and had thus prevented a devastating run on the high-street banks, which had been shut for an extended ‘Bank Holiday’. They were immediately nicknamed ‘Bradburys’ after Sir John Bradbury, the then Permanent Secretary to the Treasury, whose signature was used on the initial batches of these new notes. The general public was happy and had complete confidence in this arrangement with HM Treasury, thus resulting in no run on the banks and the British economy being saved from complete chaos and total collapse. And there was certainly no talk whatsoever of inflation being triggered by this decisive and effective course of action by His Majesty’s Government. The ‘Bradbury Pound’ had indeed saved the day. Since then, this indisputably effective historical event has been deliberately airbrushed out of Britain’s history books, thus ensuring that there is complete public ignorance of this simple and common-sense form of money creation. The current ability for private, unelected and unaccountable central bankers to control the world’s stage by directing the money supply in secret must be brought to an end. Their capability to practise fraud on a truly massive scale through their privately-controlled central banking system led by the Bank for International Settlements, must be ended immediately. Their ability to fraudulently create money out of thin air as debt—money that is not backed by anything of tangible value—must cease forthwith. This is a massive fraud that our political class has endorsed or is largely ignorant of. The world is drowning in a sea of unlawful, unsustainable debt and our politicians are playing along with this appalling criminality. According to the Office for National Statistics (ONS), Britain’s total assets were worth £10.7 trillion in 2021. The nation’s latest human capital stock figure—that is the nation’s labour potential or creativity—was valued by the ONS as being worth in the region of £21.4 trillion. This means that Britain’s total wealth is over £30 trillion. From this figure, it would be quite possible for your government to release around 5 per cent of this total—approximately £1.5 trillion—to be used as debt-free, interest-free Treasury sovereign money for the well-being, security and sovereignty of the nation. In other words, it would be new money that is spent into existence in a responsible and well managed way to meet the needs of the entire nation as regards its essential services and infrastructure. It also means that the current complex and invasive direct taxation system should come under review as should all other government revenue raising. To address all of this wrong-doing we call upon you both, as Prime Minister and as Chancellor of the Exchequer, to: Announce with immediate effect that the entire lawful part of the British economy is now supported and underpinned by the real credit, wealth and creativity of the British nation and that all future money creation and money supply will be firmly in public ownership and stewardship whereby openness, accountability and transparency will prevail at all times. Order that the Bank of England, which is ultimately controlled by the BIS, is to cease being a separate and independent entity and is to be fully and permanently absorbed into the lawful and accountable workings of HM Treasury. Sever, with immediate effect, all connections with the BIS and its privately-controlled central banking system. Authorise HM Treasury and the Royal Mint to issue debt-free, interest-free sovereign Treasury notes in the following denominations: £50, £20, £10 and £5. You will also authorise HM Treasury to instigate its own sovereign, non-programmable digital money arrangement to replace current money creation practices. Sanction that existing Bank of England notes have their debt status annulled and reclassified as debt-free, interest-free sovereign Treasury notes. Announce the widespread creation of publicly owned and completely transparent local and regional investment banks. All communities will have proper access to staffed ‘cash hubs’ thus ensuring the freedom of a healthy and balanced choice between physical cash or electronic digital money. Confirm that the value of sovereign Treasury notes is constant, stable and impervious to the whims and machinations of the private financial sector and money markets. Ensure that the prices for essential foodstuffs and energy are sensibly capped to prevent any major build-up of inflationary pressures. Begin the Common Law process to annul the criminally-arrived at and interest-bearing National Debt (now over £2.7 trillion). Suspend with immediate effect the ancient privileges and rights granted to The City of London, including the physical removal of the City Remembrancer from the Palace of Westminster. By executing these ten clear instructions, Great Britain and the United Kingdom would become completely impervious to the unlawful machinations and totalitarian ambitions of the World Economic Forum and the Bank for International Settlements. However, failure to carry out these instructions will be seen as the British Government being complicit with the aims of the Build-Back-Better ‘Great Reset’ and the fake ‘Green New Deal’—both of which are designed to deceive, ensnare and imprison humanity into a very dark future indeed. A future that will see a new and global feudal system established where evil megalomaniacs completely control people’s lives and the narrative. Such a future must never, ever be allowed to happen! With this in mind, failure by yourselves to respond to this open letter in a positive and decisive way will confirm that this new government, as with all recent and previous administrations, is nothing more than a ‘government of occupation’ that is happy to do the bidding of the globalists at the expense of us, the British people, who elected you to protect our sovereignty, our prosperity and our ancient freedoms in perpetuity. We will now leave you with this one simple question: If HM Treasury was able to use a fiscal mechanism in August 1914 that gave the British people the necessary debt-free, interest-free liquidity needed to stop a devastating financial collapse, why cannot the same fiscal mechanism be used today to prevent a similar collapse? This is a very simple question to you both—we now look forward to your public and positive response, and, of course, action. The British people are now hurting. The food banks are getting much busier. You must unleash the proven truth about money creation and money supply to protect people’s homes, livelihoods, pensions and savings. And you must stop immediately your recently announced plans to borrow yet even more unlawful debt-laden and fraudulent ‘fresh air’ money from the financial criminals in the City of London. Yours sincerely, Justin Walker Sir Julian Rose Co-founders of the Hardwick Alliance for Real Ecology (HARE) https://hardwickalliance.org/ In alliance with: https://www.newchartistmovement.org.uk https://sandiadams.net/ Anthropogenic global warming—genuine scientists, who practise real science by always following the evidence, know that so-called ‘climate change’ is occurring naturally as it has done for millions of years and that CO2, which only accounts for 0.04% of the Earth’s atmosphere, is a benign gas whose concentration actually lags temperature trends—indeed, it is considered by real ecologists to be the ‘gas of life’ for all living creatures and that we actually need more, not less! But the most frightening aspect of ‘climate change’ is how the mainstream media, especially the BBC, ITV and Channel 4, along with universities and schools, have completely and deliberately shut down any further balanced debate on this subject as they all promote a carbon-free future that endorses the globalists’ agenda for the Great Reset and the Green New Deal. Simple common sense, not to mention fairness, tells you that this is not right and that this UN-led official narrative is completely unable to meet public challenges from highly qualified climatologists. You cannot ever close down scientific debate… unless, of course, there is something to hide! For further information about the historical ‘Bradbury Pound’, please read ‘The Financiers and the Nation’ by the Rt. Hon. Thomas Johnston MP (Chapter Six – Usury on the Great War). https://archive.sustecweb.co.uk/past/sustec12-6/extract_from_the_financiers_and.htm As confirmed by the Bank of England in its Quarterly Review for the Spring of 2014 where it stated “In the modern economy, most money takes the form of bank deposits. But how those bank deposits are created is often misunderstood: the principal way is through commercial banks making loans. Whenever a bank makes a loan, it simultaneously creates a matching deposit in the borrower’s bank account, thereby creating new money.” DOWNLOAD PDF [...] Read more...
20 January, 2022NewsThe Truth University, in collaboration with the Hardwick Alliance for Real Ecology (HARE), the British Constitution Group (BCG) and the New Chartist Movement, is investigating the extent to which balanced and impartial information is being presented in UK schools, both at Primary and Secondary levels.  We would be grateful for information from parents, teachers and students on the extent to which: (i) information in textbooks, handouts and information disseminated in class is not presenting information in a completely impartial way.  Examples referencing any topic are welcomed. (ii) children and older students are being discouraged from presenting views that question mainstream narratives (whether in respect of history, economics, the British constitution, health, science (including climate), race and gender. (iii) important information is omitted from textbooks / syllabi (iv) academic standards are being maintained relative to earlier periods. All comments would be welcome by Monday 28th February and should be emailed to:  infotruthuniversity@protonmail.com.  If you could provide an indication of your status (parent, teacher, child) that would be very helpful. Any questions, please email:  info@truthuniversity.co.uk [...] Read more...
14 July, 2021PoemThe rules have changed you see gods of war no longer Mars or Aries this current strife slipped in under cover of Neptune’s duplicity the us & them & this is me in one sense disappeared. There will be no stone plinth chiselled with the names of the dead no date or end to end just the dogs of war, infernal & rolling around the planet, a giant machine plaything of corporations. Whose side are you on when each country has become one distinctions expunged, seeds of peasant farmers seized & annulled each religion folded into every other? There are no sides because so few can see the deception, this slow creeping moss, this green agenda wringing the very life from nature while ‘experts’ lay claim to be saviours. A spell has been cast, old warriors in a fug public bamboozled by an ersatz copy of a divine life they never even knew. Something not right? Oh never mind! This is close enough. Welcome to dystopia where you were slowly killed with concepts. Interesting you never noticed right up until your last breath. © Copyright 2021 Simon Heathcote. All rights reserved. [...] Read more...
1 April, 2021InterviewYogeeta Mistry and Justin Walker discuss the “The People’s Strategy” to expose the unelected, unaccountable Dark Overlords. Ep. 29: Exposing Dark Overlords: “The People’s Strategy” [...] Read more...